![]() ![]() Problems related to such use of the EPPS and which require further research are raised. Autonomy, for both men and women, appears to contribute little to differentiating among groups, and hence, any time a group is found to differ from the norm on this scale, they can be said to be really different. group used in Edwards Manual which suggested the EPPS might. Scale sensitivity and differentiation are considered in more detailed in part II of the paper. the tests used in this study for evaluating personality characteristics of teachers are. The results suggest that the representativeness of the test manual norm group and the sensitivity of the scales are questionable and that further research on the schedule is warranted. Multiple t-tests were run through computer analysis. Data were collected on previous studies, encompassing 24 male and 15 female groups, which reported means and standard deviations of sub-populations. This study was designed to observe normative differences between groups previously given the EPPS (and reported in the research literature) and to ascertain if the EPPS normative group is representative of any population. It gauges 15 such needs and provides measures of test consistency and profile stability. The Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) was designed to provide researchers in Career development with a quick and convenient measure of a number of relatively independent personality variables, or needs. It has been hypothesized that personality needs have a significant impact upon eventual occupational placement. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |